There are court cases that are often studied as they usually have historical and legal assistance. These are cases applied the moment you have a lasting effect case that concerns the law. When you have liberties or even the individual rights that have been affected, that is when these cases become more applicable in the court system.
With a landmark case you get an understanding of the entire judicial branch, therefore, understanding them is very important. The landmark cases gives you a brief summary of the working of the entire court system. It is also a way where you get to see past the court case that gets to affect your daily affairs. There are different implications that you get to have when you are talking of certain cases.
Another reason you will get many law students getting to study the cases is that they help you get perdition on what gets to happen on the current case and on the issues to take charge.
Through the landmark cases you get to realize that the court cases have an impact on the law. The implementation of the law is where the judiciary come in and not on the making of the laws. Court cases that have happened in the past can be said to be binding. They however, have to be a higher court in the land.
Through the landmark cases there is a lot of consistency in the courts. The ensure that when the cases are the same even the outcome of the case is the same. Let the decision stand, is the phrase identifying this aspect. There is a culture where the lower courts get to follow the previous decisions that have been decided by the lesser courts. Among the countries following the rule is India. The lower courts, in this case, have to follow the direction that has been laid earlier in trial courts. You get to understand that they follow something that is commonly referred to as the precedent.
We shall look into top landmark cases that students in India often study. An examples to this refers to the court case between the Eachara Varier and Secretary to the Ministry of Home. Through the case, Rajan who is a college student is involved. Under the direction of the deputy general of the police at that time he is arrested and detained. Without informing the family, the boy is killed and disposed of. The father later brings forth the case of petition about the whereabouts of his son.
Three issues are raised on whether the son was in the custody, whether he was there and whether a grant relief would be released.